Skip to main content

History of Magic Formats: Moving towards the Next Step

Periodically, this great game of ours finds itself in a position which requires a change. With Wizards recently announced back peddle to more stringently enforce the Reserved list, I believe the game finds itself at the precipice of just such a change.

Brief History of Magic Formats:
  • 1993 (290 cards) Magic debut with Alpha
  • late 1994 (1 year, 9 sets, 985 cards) Magic deck construction rules are formalized and Standardized by the Duelist Convocation, giving birth to what would later be called type 1.
  • late 1995 (2 years, 14 sets, 1,446 cards) Magic deck construction rules were officially split into 2 separate formats, Type 1 and Type 2. Type 2 was later called Standard, Type 1 Eternal. (Type 1.5 was also used to signify a format with which the type 1 restricted list was instead banned)
  • late 1996 (3 years, 16 sets, 1,903 cards) Extended was created as a format. Standard had a rotation of approximately 1 year, Extended 2 years.
  • 2002 (~8 years, ~45 sets, 6,056 cards) Standard and Extended rotations changed to a convoluted system ~2/6 years in each format.
  • 2004 (~11 years, ~55 sets 7,364 cards) Eternal were officially split Type 1 becoming Vintage, Type 1.5 becoming Legacy.
  • 2008 (~15 years, ~75 sets, 10,028 cards) Standard and Extended rotations changed to a simpler 2/7 year system.
So here we are in 2010 with an expected ~92 major releases and approaching 12,000 cards by the end of the year. As you can see, as the game continues to grow, the DCI create new plateau formats to allow players to compete on level ground. I expect that some time between now and the end of 2012, the DCI will create a new Eternal format in order to address Reserve List cards. This new format will most likely inherit the Legacy banned list, and add all the cards on the reserved list. Alternatively, this format could simply ban all cards from Urza Block and older sets.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

and Now for Something Completely Different

Well, maybe not completely different. I often use this platform to talk about something I've heard related to Magic the Gathering . Today I'm going to talk about something I have heard more and more. Sometimes in life, media, and imagination somethings take on a life of their own, becoming more then sum of their parts, and reaching beyond the scope and measure of the seed thought which spawned them. Recently it has come to my attention that something as simple as a color, has done just that. We've come together today through the force and will of pink . For a year now this simple blending of red and white has brought people together from all across the globe, inspired and renewed friendships, shared hopes, dreams, and passions of individuals. It has in some small but measurable way, changed the world, and the people in it. I have thought that I was beyond the scope of this phenomenon, as beyond an impressive collection of scars, I really have nothing pink in my life. Let...

Happy 3rd Birthday to Pink Saturday!

Grim Tidings #26: Flip-Flop

I think the majority of magic articles I write aren't very helpful. For the most part are a stream of self-congratulatory praise of how great my proven decks are. Sure, my cutting sarcasm and wit occasionally generate a chuckle (I still love the Chaos Orb piece) but for the most part, I they all smoosh together into a long wordy rant of why I think this-or-that card is so great and why you should play it too. It’s my own fault. I pretend that everyone who reads my ramblings knows who I am, and has the same preference in play style. I assume everyone plays Casual-Competitive Magic, that they all play 300 card 5-Color decks, highlander style, and they have access to all 10,000+ cards to randomly insert in Deck XYZ at any moment’s notice. Obviously this is untrue. The root of the problem may lie in my core deck: “First Reminder”. I gush on and on about this deck, partly to brag on my collection, and partly to show-off my self-proclaimed cleverness. The deck has gained notoriety (for w...